🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.